Monday, December 29, 2008

How PUSHING DAISIES will end

Before I begin, I'd like to point out that all of this is conjecture. This is actually a theory that I came up with months ago, and Jennie can attest to that because I shared it with her and I thought I was the smartest person ever but that it wouldn't happen for a long time, because clearly PUSHING DAISIES was destined to be on the air for years and years. Sigh. Anyway, after being a few episodes on the series, we finally got caught up, and I'm convinced now more than ever that my theory will come to pass. So here it goes...

HOW PUSHING DAISIES WILL END:
- Ned's father will return and reveal that he, too, can bring things back to life by touching them
- It will be revealed that Ned died once when he was very young (perhaps at birth) and that his father brought him back to life. He later abandoned Ned because he didn't want to risk touching him and killing him again
- Ned will touch Chuck again, killing her. Ned's father will then touch her, bringing her back to life. Ned's father will then die, sacrificing himself so that Ned and Chuck can be together
- Ned and Chuck will kiss; no one will die

Also, I'm sure there'll be some stuff with Emerson and Olive in there, too, but I'm more concerned with Ned and Chuck. Emerson needs to find his daughter, and Olive needs to get over Ned (perhaps with Emerson? What an odd couple that would be). But the main conflict of the series of course stems from the fact that Ned and Chuck cannot touch, and my little theory would take care of that.

So how do I support my theory? Before the most recent episodes, I couldn't. It was pure conjecture. But after the last episode that has aired, I think I'm on pretty solid ground. The facts are these:
- Ned's father has returned. He appeared at the end of the most recent episode, and appears to be watching over Ned, even going so far as to save his and Olive's lives
- Ned's father appeared to be covered from head to toe, save for his face (naturally). I have thought from the beginning of the show that Ned and Chuck could hold hands and/or not have to worry about bumping into each other constantly if Ned would just wear long-sleeved shirts, pants, and, above all, GLOVES. We saw in a recent episode Chuck's father (whom I will come back to) grab Ned by the sleeved arm with his bare hand, and he did not die, presumably because of Ned's sleeve. So why is the fact that Ned's father wore gloves important? Because if he hadn't been wearing gloves, and he had grabbed Ned to stop him from falling, Ned would have died. According to the theory, anyway.
- Ned's father abandoned Ned at the Longville School for Boys when he was very young, and we have never seen him, not even during scenes in which Ned's mother was alive. The debate between Ned and Chuck's father is that the only way to protect Chuck is to get her as far away from Ned as possible so that the chance of their accidentally touching becomes nonexistent. I think that looking at Ned's father's abandonment of him through the lens of a father trying to protect his child provides a perfect reason for Ned's father to have abandoned him in the first place: he wanted to minimize the chance of his ever accidentally touching Ned and killing him again.

Until the remaining episodes of the series air, we won't know for sure what happens. Supposedly there's going to be some sort of closure, but I doubt it will be the amount of closure that devoted fans (read: me) will want. In the mean time, I'm comfortable with my theory. Because yes, these are the things that I think about all of the time.

5 comments:

  1. Yes to everything except Emerson and Olive getting together because . . . no. Just . . . no.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Pure genius.

    Expect for the Olive & Emerson thing. That's just wrong.

    (My word verification is "bedned". Does that mean anything?)

    ReplyDelete
  3. i really like the ending you propouse, i think it works, but olive has to end up with that guy, the one who once fixed the capuchino machine not emerson, he has to find his daughter and get back with the mother of her daughter or the dog trainer. (i do agree there will be some (more) tension between olive and emerson, but never a relationship) its the worst thing the show got cancelled, it is a great show whit a true history (sorry if my english wasnt that good, i sound much better in german)

    ReplyDelete
  4. I also have very very similar ideas about how the story will end.

    I was rewatching season one and in the episode Corpsicle, I was pretty sure that I saw Ned's father touch him on the head, so I'm not sure about that part about his father leaving so he wouldn't touch him again. And even more evidence than that, Ned ages so he therefore can't be 'alive again'.

    But I'm so sure that there's something special about Ned's father. Maybe he has a similar gift but it just works differently?

    Julie- The word verification must have read your mind :P I think I'd like to bed Ned.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Here we are almost a year later and I still long to see more Chuck, Ned, Olive and Emerson. The biggest mistake ABC has made in it's entire existence was the cancellation of Pushing Daisies. /sighs

    Shame on you ABC big wigs for not knowing what your viewers truly want to watch.

    Long live Chuck and Ned.

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.